Why aren't you a no-kill shelter?
Sadly, the math is unalterable: if we take in 8,145 stray or abandoned animals each year, and we're able to find homes for only 2,770 of these animals, that means that 4,968 animals have nowhere to go. We believe that given the circumstances, a painless death is the best choice among a limited set of awful choices.
No-kill shelters disagree, and try to alter the math. The best no-kill shelters sharply limit the number and type of animals they will take. If they're near capacity, they'll refuse to take in additional animals, forcing the owners to find another place for the animal. Many no-kill shelters will never accept animals that will be difficult to adopt, such as older or injured animals. Owners often report to us that they've brought us animals only after being refused by one or more no-kill shelters. The worst no-kill shelters will house animals for years in small cages, often causing animals to go literally insane. We do not believe this is a preferable, or even realistic, alternative to euthanasia.
There's nothing wrong with no-kill shelters, as long as they're honest about their limitations -- especially the limited number of animals they're able to help. However, until we end the pet overpopulation problem in our community, a full-service shelter that performs euthanasia is a tragic necessity.
We understand why people get angry over euthanasia; the situation makes us furious, and it sickens us that we must euthanize so many wonderful animals each year. We believe that this anger is properly directed at the source of the problem: pet owners who abandon their animals, or who do not sterilize their animals. No-kill shelters do not address the real problem; only a concerted effort to end overpopulation can do that.
One more point is important: certain euthanasias are required by law. For example, animal control officers are prohibited from releasing aggressive wildlife. Similarly, some owners specifically request that their sick or injured pet be humanely euthanized; in such cases, we are legally and ethically bound to do so.
